ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of flumatinib in the treatment of imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients with chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML-CP).Methods:The clinical data of 9 CML-CP patients who received flumatinib after imatinib resistance or intolerance in Jining No. 1 People's Hospital from April 2020 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were evaluated for the hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses, progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and adverse reactions.Results:Among 9 CML-CP patients, there were 4 imatinib-resistant patients and 5 imatinib-intolerant patients. The median duration of flumatinib exposure was 17 months (1-25 months). Except for 1 case who discontinued flumatinib early due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia and other adverse reactions, 7 of the remaining 8 cases achieved the best response at 3, 6 and 12 months of flumatinib therapy. By the end of follow-up in April 2022, 7, 7 and 6 patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5), respectively. The median time to achieving CCyR, MMR and MR4.5 was 4.5 months (3-6 months), 12 months (3-12 months) and 15 months (3-21 months), respectively. Within 17 months (11-25 months) of follow-up, 7 of the 9 patients had EFS and 8 patients with continuous flumatinib had PFS. Among 9 patients treated with flumatinib, hematologic adverse reactions were observed in 6 cases, and grade 3-4 hematologic adverse reactions occurred in 2 cases. Non-hematologic reactions events mainly included diarrhea (4 cases), muscle ache (2 cases), fatigue (2 cases) and liver damage (2 cases), which were all grade 1-2.Conclusions:Flumatinib is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML-CP patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate clinical features of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with TET2 gene mutation and effects of TET2 mutation on therapeutic efficacy and prognosis.Methods:A total of 123 newly diagnosed adult AML patients (except for acute promyelocytic leukemia) admitted to Jining No.1 People's Hospital from March 2017 to April 2021 were selected. Mutations of 24 AML-related genes including TET2 mutation were detected by using second-generation sequencing technology. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of TET2 mutation: TET2 mutation group and TET2 wild type group. The differences in clinicopathological characteristics, short-term efficacy and survival of both groups were compared.Results:Among 123 patients, TET2 mutation was detected in 28 cases (22.8%). Compared with TET2 wild type group, the patients were older [(59±15) years vs.(49±16) years, t = 2.984, P = 0.003], French-American-British (FAB) Corporative Group M 4 and M 5 subtypes were more common [75.0% (21/28) vs. 51.6% (49/95), χ2 = 4.838, P = 0.028], and the positive rate of CD34 in AML patients was lower in TET2 mutation group [46.4% (13/28) vs.72.6% (69/95), χ2 = 6.685, P = 0.010]. Moreover, TET2 mutation was more likely to be accompanied with ZRSR2 mutation [10.7% (3/28) vs. 1.1% (1/95), P = 0.037] and NPM1 mutation [35.7% (10/28) vs.17.9% (17/95), χ2 = 4.008, P = 0.045], but less likely to be accompanied with IDH1/2 mutation [0 vs.17.9% (17/95), P = 0.012]. However, there were no statistically significant differences in gender, peripheral blood leukocyte count at initial diagnosis, hemoglobin level, platelet count, bone marrow blasts ratio, cytogenetics and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification between the two groups (all P>0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in the overall response rate (ORR) of 1 cycle chemotherapy [75.0% (12/16) vs. 66.7% (42/63), χ2 = 0.410, P = 0.522] and demethylation therapy [66.7% (4/6) vs. 44.4% (8/18), P = 0.640]. The difference in overall survival (OS) of both groups was not statistically significant [median OS time: 23 months (95% CI 5-41 months) vs. 35 months (95% CI 18-52 months, P = 0.498]. Conclusions:In AML patients, TET2 mutation is associated with advanced age, M 4 and M 5 subtypes, and low expression of CD34 on AML blasts. TET2 mutation is commonly accompanied by ZRSR2 and NPM1 mutation, but not IDH1 or IDH2 mutation. TET2 mutation may have no significant effects on therapeutic efficacy and survival in the whole cohort of AML patients without risk stratification.